四川：春节期间将组织开展2000余场（次）文化旅游活动******
中新网成都1月16日电 (记者 岳依桐)记者16日从四川省政府新闻办在成都举行的“欢乐川味年——安逸相伴 乐游四川”新闻发布会获悉，春节期间，四川文旅系统将组织开展艺术展演、文博展览、群众文化、非遗传承、消费促进等六大类2000余场(次)文旅活动。
据介绍，为促进文旅消费升级，四川各地将以非遗代表性项目为依托，线上线下开展1600余场(次)群众文化活动和民俗节庆活动；开展国省“村晚”示范展示活动，用农民自编自导、自演自赏的春节联欢会，唱身边事，演身边人，道家乡美，赞新生活；四川非遗馆将举办“安逸四川——非遗过大年”非遗传承实践活动600余场，集中展出一批与年俗相关的非遗代表性项目和传承人代表性作品。
四川全省文艺院团将采取线上线下相结合的方式，组织开展210余场文艺展演活动，内容涵盖川剧、舞剧、话剧、歌曲、舞蹈等近20个艺术门类约2000台(个)文艺作品。同时，四川文博场馆将组织开展200余场文博展览及配套活动，四川省207家公共图书馆、206家文化馆都将全部免费开放，春节七天“不打烊”。
新闻发布会现场。 岳依桐 摄为全方位促进文旅消费，四川各地还将发放文化和旅游专项消费券，推出景区门票减免、酒店民宿优惠等系列文化旅游惠民举措。四川省21个市(州)联动，配套推出“欢乐星期五”——文化和旅游打卡日系列消费活动，在每周五向消费者发放文旅消费券。
另外，阿坝、甘孜、凉山和攀枝花的国有4A级及以上旅游景区实行“门票买一送一”、国有4A级以下旅游景区门票全免的优惠政策，绵阳开展“一元游绵阳，万张门票等你抢”活动，广元剑门关景区推出完整背诵《蜀道难》免费领门票活动，其他市(州)结合实际实施本地优惠政策，全省共有144家国家4A级及以上旅游景区实施景区门票减免或买一赠一等优惠政策，让“冬游四川”热度不减。
在精心策划推出“趣享新春”“欢享冰雪”“畅享温泉”“天府手造”“悠享美宿”“夜间嘉年华”等六大系列新春文化旅游消费促进活动外，四川还推出系列主题旅游资源及线路，包括年俗非遗闹新春线路、趣游蜀地博物馆线路、潮玩天府正当时线路、天府旅游美食吃不停线路、跟着诗词游天府线路等。
通过特色创新打造当代新年俗，是文旅活动的“新”特点之一。四川省文化和旅游厅副厅长严飒爽说，传统与现代相得益彰，数字科技融入传统民俗应用在新年场景中，借助旅游业与互联网、科技的融合，让传统年味有了更加潮流化的表达，唤醒新一代年节记忆。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
